A shared record for those under a priest; a temporary beginning for those not yet under one.
Please read this first
This is an app concept, planned and designed to be put before the Church before a line of code is written. The screens below are drawings, not screenshots of software. We are asking whether this should exist at all — and if the answer is no, that is worth knowing now.
Why this exists
Jonathan is one of thousands who have found Orthodoxy on YouTube. He is watching, he is earnest, and he wants the Christian life. There is no church in his area, or he has not yet walked into one.
The danger is not his enthusiasm. It is that he finds an app, a book, or a voice online, and settles into a piety that never leaves the screen.
Chotki is aimed at that man. It gives him only a thin, provisional start — and it is built to make that start feel unfinished until a priest has him under his care. The shape of this design is what we are asking you to evaluate.
Jonathan, the inquirer on his own
Jonathan is given only what is common to the whole Church — morning and evening prayers, the Wednesday and Friday fast, the Jesus Prayer, the day's appointed readings. It is deliberately thin, because almost everything beyond that line varies between jurisdictions and parishes, and is exactly what a priest decides.
He may keep disciplines of his own — sleep, study, exercise, sobriety — but the editor does not offer a liturgical or ascetic category. The restriction is the absence of the option, not a warning he can dismiss.
And when Jonathan reaches for something that belongs on the other side of that line, the application does not lecture him. It stores his question in memory and prompts him to direct it toward a priest.
Three questions waiting
Things you have wondered about, written down so you can ask someone. Most priests would rather be asked.
Four things. That is enough to begin with, and beginning small is the counsel every priest gives.
of 33
Click, or press space.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God,
have mercy on me, a sinner.
Jonathan enters the Church.
Jonathan keeps his discipline; the priest follows along — encrypted end to end.
Each line carries a mark: given with a blessing for what his priest gave him, parish for what the parish keeps together, my own for the rest. At a glance he can see which parts of his rule are the Church's and which are his own idea.
That single mark is what makes an honest confession possible later: Father, the two you gave me I kept; the third I set myself, and it was too much.
A rule his priest gives him is never installed silently. It arrives named and dated, and he receives it — because in the tradition a rule is given and received, and the receiving is an act.
From Fr. Seraphim new
The Akathist to the Theotokos, on Saturdays. “Begin with this through the autumn and we will see how you find it. If it is too much on top of the evening prayers, say so and we will change it — that is not a failure, it is how this is meant to work.”
For the priest, carrying his people
The application arrives already populated with publicly sourced prayers, readings and fasting rules for whichever church he names — a starting point, so that he is not facing a blank screen. From there it is completely his: every prayer may be rewritten in his parish's own wording, removed, or replaced with a reference — pages twelve to eighteen of your prayer book — where the parish already uses physical books.
He assigns a rule to one man with a click, or publishes what the whole parish keeps. What arrives on their phones is his practice, not somebody else's.
And he can see what was actually kept — without asking Jonathan to remember, under pressure, at a moment when he is already ashamed.
The last month, in his own view
Morning prayers were kept on every day but two. Evening prayers were kept on most days; the ones that were missed were all Fridays. The rope has been picked up steadily since June.
The Akathist you gave on Saturdays has been kept twice since it was received a fortnight ago.
Fridays
Every missed evening prayer this month fell on a Friday. Chotki names a pattern only when every slip shares one, and draws no conclusion from it.
“28 of 30”, not “93%”. The counts are what a person can say aloud; the percentage is what turns it into a score.
Jonathan has paired Chotki with his spiritual father.
Mark one of Jonathan's disciplines complete, and watch it update on Fr. Seraphim's screen. Give Jonathan a rule, and watch it appear on his phone.
This is a demo you can operate. It shows you what the app does when it is paired with a spiritual father.
Jonathan's phone
His rule today
Fr. Seraphim's phone
Today · Wednesday 2 September
Give him a rule
It will not appear in his rule until he receives it.
Notice what does not happen. Fr. Seraphim doesn't receive a notification when something is missed. No alerts, no flags, no commentary. Fr. Seraphim follows Jonathan as closely or as distantly as he believes is appropriate. The application is always neutral: the relationship belongs to Jonathan and Fr. Seraphim. Chotki facilitates it; it does not influence it.
Privacy
A record of who prays, who fasts, and who was at Liturgy is, in law, the most protected class of information there is. It is treated that way here, not as a feature but as the only arrangement in which the rest of this is honest.
Everything is locked on the device before it leaves it, and can be opened only by the priest it was addressed to. The keys are exchanged in person — the priest’s screen shows a code, the parishioner’s phone reads it — so they pass directly between two people standing together, with nothing in between and nothing to intercept.
When an individual and their spiritual father are apart, encrypted communications are sent through a server which is completely blind to the data it relays. There is no user account, and no record of a person is stored anywhere other than your own devices.
This guarantee does not depend on trusting Chotki's server, because it is a property of how it is built rather than a promise about anyone's intentions. And confession does not exist inside the application at all. There is nowhere to write what was said there, and no field that asks. It appears only as a rule about attending it, exactly like a rule about attending Liturgy.
Restraint
These are not features left for a later version. They are constraints the design commits to, and each one exists because the alternative would alter the relationship between people and their spiritual fathers.
No sorting by consistency, no league table, no colour-coding of people, no parish average. A priest may look through his people one at a time; the software never orders them by how they are doing.
Chotki is designed to keep relationships transparent and close, not to usurp the role of any spiritual authority. It will never tattle, nag, or evaluate a user's commitment.
No chat, no direct messages. When a priest gives a rule, one question may be asked about it, or there may be a request for economia later. He answers; it is acknowledged; the field disappears. If that does not settle it, the application has deliberately run out of road, and the next move is in person.
No directory of clergy, no church suggestions, no “priests near you.” The user is encouraged to govern that search themselves, and Chotki trusts the Holy Spirit — not online influencers or its own opinions — to guide them correctly.
A day kept is answered with thanksgiving, not applause. There is no red anywhere, no “failed”, no broken-streak language, and no comparison against a target or a better past self.
It reports what the calendar marks — the calendar marks this as a strict fast — never what a person must eat or do. Practice varies between jurisdictions, and the application names who to ask rather than answering.
The governing principle
Chotki is not a substitute for a priest. It cannot hear a confession, it cannot give a blessing, and it can never replace that relationship. What it can do is carry an honest record between individuals and their spiritual fathers — so that when they next sit down, neither has to rely on memory, nor be steered by temptation.
Until that relationship exists, Chotki is not that record. It is a calendar, a rope, and a short list marked not given by a priest. It should feel unfinished. If it ever feels like arrival, the design has failed.
Everything in the design follows from these foundational precepts.
What we are asking
Before we undertake the work of building this application, we want to know whether a tool of this kind belongs in the life of a parish at all, and whether the shape it has been given here is one the Church could accept.
We would appreciate hearing your feedback by replying to the email you received from us. We want to get this right, and need your help to do it.
Particular questions, if they are useful to you:
If you would not use it, that is the most useful thing you could tell us. It is a great deal cheaper to abandon an idea now than after it is built.
Chotki is an independent project. It is not sanctioned by, affiliated with, or endorsed by any jurisdiction, parish or brotherhood, and nothing in it speaks for anyone. It is offered for judgement, and the judgement is not ours to make.